Review Flashback: Luxury Sedans of 1973 (Comparison Test)

All things are relative. While no one would expect any of the vehicles featured below to shine in terms of braking performance, the Editors of Consumer Guide called out the Chrysler Imperial for its dubious stopping ability. And that’s just one of the many insights buried in the test report below.

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Consumer Guide: ’73 Auto Test

This comparison test appeared in the Consumer Guide: ’73 Auto Test magazine, which hit newsstands in June of that year. Featured below are:

  • Cadillac Sedan de Ville
  • Chrysler Imperial LeBaron
  • Lincoln Continental
  • Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL

Of these, the Mercedes is sort of the odd man out. The 300 SEL evaluated here was considerably smaller, lighter, and vastly more expensive than the other vehicles reviewed. That said, the Benz justified its staggering price with a first-place finish in the comparison, earning praise for its impressive ride and handling, among other things. It did not score well for power, however. Even though the 300 SEL boasted the most horsepower of the four cars tested, it provided the least amount of torque… and be it 1973 or 2021, Americans like their torque.

If you recall having spent time with one or more of these rolling tributes to vehicular indulgence, tell us about it. The place to leave comments is down below.

More Review Flashback! fun

Review Flashback: Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Review Flashback! 2004 Chrysler 300M

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Cadillac Sedan de Ville

Luxury Sedans of 1973 – Cadillac de Ville

Review Flashback! 1974 Dodge Monaco

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973 – Chrysler Imperial LeBaron

Review Flashback! 2004 Mercury Marauder

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973 – Lincoln Continental

Review Flashback! 2005 Buick Park Avenue

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973 – Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL

Review Flashback! 2005 Pontiac Bonneville

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Luxury Sedans of 1973 Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL

Review Flashback! 2011 Lincoln Town Car

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Specs

1973 Luxury Sedans  Specs

Review Flashback! 2002 Cadillac Eldorado

Luxury Sedans of 1973

1973 Luxury Sedans Ratings

Review Flashback! 2002 Lincoln Blackwood

Luxury Sedans of 1973

Prices – 1973 Cadillac de Ville

Review Flashback! 1982 Imperial

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Prices

Prices – 1973 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron

Review Flashback! 1986 Oldsmobile Toronado

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Prices

Prices – 1973 Chrysler Imperial LeBaron

Review Flashback! 1997 Cadillac Catera

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Prices

Prices – 1973 Lincoln Continental

Review Flashback! 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora

Luxury Sedans of 1973 - Prices

Prices – 1973 Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL

Listen to the Consumer Guide Car Stuff Podcast

Follow Tom on Twitter

The Luxury Sedans of 1973 Gallery

(Click below for enlarged images)

Review Flashback! The Premium Coupes of 1988

For GREAT deals on a new or used Buick, Chevrolet or GMC check out Shoreside GM TODAY!

Review Flashback: 2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

Thanks in large part to Chevrolet’s involvement in NASCAR racing, the somewhat anachronistic Monte Carlo outlived its useful life span by half a decade or so. By 2000, the mainstream-brand midsize/large coupe segment was all but gone, with only the coupe versions of the Honda Accord and the Toyota Camry (dubbed Solara) still seeing meaningful sales volume.

Monte Carlo Sales ChartThe sixth—and last—generation of the Monte Carlo debuted for 2000. The Monte rode on General Motors’ W-platform architecture, and was thus similar mechanically to the Buick Century, Lacrosse, and Regal, as well as the Chevrolet Impala, Oldsmobile Intrigue, and Pontiac Grand Prix.

A performance-oriented version of the Monte Carlo, the SS, was available for the entire 2000-2007 run of the last-gen model. For 2000-2006, the SS was powered by a supercharged version of GM’s ubiquitous 3.8-liter “3800” V6. The beefy engine cranked out a middling 240 horsepower, but a substantial 280 lb-ft of torque at just 3600 rpm.

The big news for performance fans was the arrival of a 5.3-liter V8 for 2006. This pushrod V8, also found under the hood of GM’s half-ton pickups, was good for substantially more horsepower (303) and torque (323 lb-ft) than the V6.

Monte Carlos powered by the 5.3 V8 are rather rare, as the engine became available midway through the 2006 model year, and total sales volume for 2006 and 2007—the Monte’s last years—was very low.

Shared below is Consumer Guide’s original review of the 2007 Monte Carlo SS (including the original “News” section at the end of the report, which looks forward to the impending arrival of the reborn Chevrolet Camaro). Noteworthy is the absence of comment regarding the V8 Monte Carlo’s most sinister handling characteristic: torque steer. As this author can attest to first hand, full-throttle acceleration in any V8-powered GM W-platform model resulted in impressive pull to the side and required healthy amounts of driver correction to keep the car on course. You can read all about that torque steer here.

More Review Flashback! fun

2007 Monte Carlo SS Review

Overview

Chevrolet’s midsize coupe shares its basic underskin design with the Impala sedan. Monte Carlo comes in LS, LT, and sporty SS trim. LS and LT have a 211-hp V6 engine. SS has a 303-hp V8 with GM’s Active Fuel Management that deactivates four cylinders while cruising to save fuel. The 233-hp V6 LTZ model is discontinued. All Monte Carlos have a 4-speed automatic transmission. Front side airbags are standard. Curtain side airbags are unavailable. Leather upholstery and heated front seats are standard on SS, available on LT. OnStar assistance is standard.

Torque-Steering Trio: Remembering GM’s “Small Block” Front-Drivers

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo engine specs

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo engine specs

Acceleration

Ample power at any speed. Similar test Impalas with 211-hp V6 less strong but still more than adequate in around-town driving. Ethanol-blended fuel, called E85, is available in many states and can be less expensive than regular-grade gasoline. E85 can be used in 211-hp Monte Carlos. Test Impalas showed no difference in acceleration using E85.

Fuel Economy

Test SS averaged 17.2 mpg in mostly city driving. V6 Monte Carlos use regular-grade fuel. Chevy recommends premium for V8s.

Ride Comfort

Surprisingly compliant given SS models’ sport suspension and 18-inch tires. Large bumps felt but Monte Carlo is never harsh.

Handling

SS has sporty moves with well-balanced steering, though it never really feels agile. Good stopping control.

Quietness

Wind rush and tire roar both intrude. V8 subdued at cruise, has muscle car rumble under throttle.

Controls

Gauges clearly marked, easy to read. Large, clearly marked radio/climate controls have easy-grip rubberized surfaces, operate smoothly, though climate controls mounted too low for easy use. Monte Carlo trails most like-priced imports for quality feel. Hard plastic expanses dominate cabin, have budget look and feel.

Review Flashback! 1987 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo specs

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo specs

Comfort

FRONT: Head, leg room adequate. Good seat comfort with easy entry/exit. Decent visibility compromised slightly by thick rear pillars.

REAR: Generous space for a sporty coupe, though passengers over 5-ft-10 will want more head room. High step over, low seat complicate entry/exit.

Cargo Room

Generous trunk space for a coupe, just average for a midsize car. Standard 60/40 split folding rear seatbacks increase versatility. Adequate cabin storage.

Headlamp Hat Dance: 6 Years of the Chevrolet Monte Carlo

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Prices

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo prices

Value

Monte Carlo is a throwback to the era of the midsize domestic coupe, trading passenger space and cargo room for a sporty profile. It’s affordable, has competent road manners, and the SS accelerates and sounds like a muscle car. But this midsize car feels dated compared to class pacesetters such as the Honda Accord and Toyota Solara.

News

Monte Carlo is a goner after 2007, say our sources. Slow sales are the main reason. But another factor is the announced return of a Camaro coupe and convertible on General Motors’ new rear-wheel-drive Zeta platform. Expected to start sale in early 2009, Chevy’s reborn “ponycars” should look much like the recent crowd-wowing concepts. Like previous Camaros, the new ones will seat four and offer both V6 and V8 power. Independent rear suspension is planned to trump the solid axle of archrival Ford Mustang.

Listen to the Consumer Guide Car Stuff Podcast

Follow Tom on Twitter

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS Gallery

2007 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS

Review Flashback! 2004 Chrysler 300M

2004 Chrysler 300M Review

2004 Chrysler 300M

It was known internally as “LH,” and it was the architecture on which a number of popular and well-regarded Chrysler Corporation large cars were built. Known for their short-hood “Cab Forward” design, the LH cars included mainstream products (Dodge Intrepid, Chrysler Concorde), luxury cars (Chrysler New Yorker, Chrysler LHS), and one long-forgotten model (Eagle Vision).

Also planned for production, but ultimately never built, was a Plymouth LH variant named Accolade.

The LH cars first appeared for the 1993 model year, and were redesigned for 1998 and 1999, depending on the model. Added to the LH roster for 1999 was a new Chrysler model, the 300M. Designed to emulate European sport sedans, the 300M was designed as a “five-meter car,” which meant that the car was shorter than five meters long overall–this because in most European markets, cars longer than five meters were considered unwieldy to drive in urban environments, and in some markets were subject to higher taxes.

[embedded content]

Distribution of the 300M in Europe was pretty uneven, so it’s unclear how well the car was received in those markets, but it proved pretty popular on our shores. So much so that the Chrysler LHS, which was similarly priced, was dropped after 2001 due to shopper preference for the “M.”

Compared to the Concorde with which it shared a showroom, the 300M was more legitimately upscale, featuring a larger standard engine, premium cabin appointments, and manual-shift capability for the standard 4-speed automatic transmission. The 300M rode on the same 113-inch wheelbase as the Concorde, though as noted above, it was somewhat shorter in overall length.

The 300M was discontinued after 2004 to make way for Chrysler’s new “LX” cars, a family of rear-wheel-drive large cars first realized as the Chrysler 300 sedan and the Dodge Magnum wagon. The Magnum was discontinued after the 2008 model year, but the Chrysler 300 sedan is still offered for 2021.

Presented here is Consumer Guide’s original review of the 2004 Chrysler 300M (including the original “News” section at the end of the report, which details the arrival of the 2005 Chrysler 300). Note the availability of a sporty Special trim level. Added to the 300M lineup for 2002, the Special represented a fairly hefty price bump over the standard 300M, and we suspect it was fairly rare even back in the day.

More Review Flashback! fun

2004 Chrysler 300M Review

Overview

Available satellite radio, a new navigation system, and midyear availability of a hands-free cellular-phone link highlight 2004 changes to the 300M. Appearance and major equipment are unchanged. The 300M is built on the chassis of the Chrysler Concorde and Dodge Intrepid, but is pitched as a European-flavored alternative with distinct styling and a slightly shorter body. Its V6 makes 250 hp in the base model and 255 in the performance-oriented 300M Special. Both use Chrysler’s AutoStick 4-speed automatic transmission with a separate gate for manual shifting. ABS and traction control are standard. Front side airbags are optional. The Special has unique trim, lowered and stiffened suspension, higher-speed-rated tires, and xenon headlights. Both come with leather upholstery. For ’04, satellite radio is a new option for both models. So is a navigation system, which includes the satellite-radio option. Also, the Special and base now come with 17-inch wheels. The Special’s previously standard 18-inch wheels are now included in a new Ultimate Performance option package. Added midyear as a dealer-installed option was Chrysler’s UConnect, which uses the audio system as a hands-free, wireless link to any cell phone in the vehicle. The 300M will be phased out in Spring 2004 and replaced by the new rear-drive 2005 300.

Review Flashback! 2004 Mercury Marauder

Chrysler 300M Engines

2004 Chrysler 300M engine specs

Acceleration

With more horsepower than most 6-cyl near-luxury cars, pickup and throttle response are good–and competitive with any direct rival. Test 300M Special did 7.5 sec 0-60 mph. Automatic transmission shifts abruptly in rapid acceleration.

Fuel Economy

Test 300M averaged 14.4 mpg in mostly city driving; expect slightly higher in a more even city/highway mix. Test Specials averaged 23.1 mpg in mostly highway driving, and 16.2 mpg with gas-eating performance tests. 300M Special requires premium fuel; 300M uses regular.

Ride Comfort

Base model rides firmly, but smothers bumps fairly well. Special’s stiffer suspension and optional 18-inch tires make for a somewhat harsh ride on flawed pavement.

Handling

300M changes direction with surprising assertiveness. Special takes handling up a notch. Steering slightly dead on-center, though, with a trace of free play. Substantial brake-pedal pressure required in simulated panic stops, but stability is impressive, distances short.

Quietness

Road and wind noise aren’t intrusive, but these cars are less isolating than import rivals. Road rumble bothersome on Specials with 18-inch tires. Most import sedans in this price range have smoother, nicer-sounding engines than this V6.

Controls

Well-placed controls with excellent tactile feel. Instrument markings can be difficult to see at dusk. Materials and assembly good overall, but not in a league with import rivals. New navigation radio is mounted too low and screen is too small for visual use; audio directions should be followed.

Cab Forward: The Chrysler LH Cars of 1994

2004 Chrysler 300 specs

2004 Chrysler 300M specs

Comfort

FRONT: Very good space and comfort. Standard heated front bucket seats. Narrow rear window compromises aft visibility.

REAR: Among the roomiest near-luxury cars, though some testers find the seat cushion unevenly contoured for best comfort. Easy entry/exit through large doors.

Cargo Room

Trunk among largest in class, but opening isn’t generous. Handy 60/40 split folding rear seatback is standard.

Unsettling Transition: The 1988 Eagle Lineup

Chrysler 300M price list, Performance Handling Group

2004 Chrysler 300M prices

Value

These Chryslers give up a tangible measure of prestige and refinement to the top competition, and their cabin decor isn’t as sophisticated. But few similarly priced rivals match their blend of interior space and overall performance.

News

The 300M was replaced in early 2004 by the 300. Built on a new “LX” platform that trades front-wheel drive for rear drive, the 300 is slightly shorter, with a longer wheelbase and more conventional looks than the “cab forward” M. Various underskin components are borrowed from parent Mercedes’ E-Class, including suspension design and antiskid/traction control system. It’s an effort to realize the cost-saving “synergies” promised with Chrysler’s 1998 takeover by Daimler-Benz.

(Click gallery pics below for enlarged images)

Follow Tom on Twitter

Listen to the very entertaining Consumer Guide Car Stuff Podcast

Chrysler 300M Review Gallery

Chrysler 300M Review